Pollster · Academic
University of Southern California Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research
- Polls since 2024
- 3
- Latest poll ended
- October 28, 2026
- Record vs. results, relative
- D+1.1
Polls from the VoteHub polling API, used under CC BY 4.0. Each result links to the pollster's or sponsor's own release. Imported once a day; a poll VoteHub later changes keeps its earlier version on record here.
§1About
Drafted by AI from the public sources cited. Each sentence links to its source.
The Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR) is a University of Southern California research center whose website describes it as studying how social services, public policy and population trends affect well-being, with offices in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.2 USC's Schaeffer Institute announced on April 13, 2026 that CESR had joined the Schaeffer Institute for Public Policy & Government Service, to be administered by the USC Price School of Public Policy, and said Arie Kapteyn founded CESR in 2013 and is its executive director.3,
§2Who it works with
Why this matters: Owners, news partners and the firms behind a poll's interviews shape what gets asked, how, and what gets published.
Part of
News partners
- Los Angeles Times (2016–2016). Its election poll page says the 2016 Daybreak tracking poll was run in partnership with the Los Angeles Times.6
Polls regularly for
- University of Southern California Center for the Political Future (2016–2016). Its election poll page names USC's Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics, which it says is now the Center for the Political Future, as a partner in the 2016 Daybreak poll.6
Founded by
- Arie Kapteyn (2013). The Schaeffer Institute announcement says Arie Kapteyn, a USC Dornsife economics professor, founded CESR in 2013.3
Led by
- Arie Kapteyn. The Schaeffer Institute announcement names Arie Kapteyn as CESR's executive director.3
Published with
Names its polls have been published under, alongside other pollsters or news outlets.
- University of Southern California Democracy and Fair Elections Lab/University of Southern California Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research: University of Southern California Democracy and Fair Elections Lab · 3 polls listed
Who paid for its polls
| Sponsor | Polls | Between | Flagged party-aligned |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California Center for the Political Future | 3 | October 28, 2026 | No |
§3Whom it works for
Why this matters: A firm that also works for one party's campaigns can still publish accurate polls, but readers deserve to know.
Doesn’t say whom it works for. The CESR pages read do not say whether it works for candidates or parties; its election poll page says USC initiated and financed its 2020 poll.2,
Of its 3 polls listed since the 2024 election, VoteHub flags 0 as paid for by a Democratic-aligned sponsor and 0 by a Republican-aligned sponsor8.
§4Record against results
Why this matters: The one test that doesn't depend on other polls: how close a firm's final polls came to what voters did.
From FiveThirtyEight's final public data9,
| Published as | Polls | Elections | Average miss | Relative to other polls | Typical size of miss | 538's last rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research | 8 | 2016–2020 | D+2.3 | D+1.1 | 5.4 pts | 2.4 of 3 |
ABC News closed FiveThirtyEight in March 2025; its data stops at the 2022 elections. 2026 results will be added once states certify them.
§52026 record against the count
Why this matters: How close this pollster's last 2026 polls came to how people voted, measured the way FiveThirtyEight measured earlier elections.
2 polls of 2 races between a Democrat and a Republican, with field periods ending in the 21 days before November 3, 2026, compared with each race's count. Some of those races are still being counted, so these figures use the unofficial count and will change until states certify.
- Average miss
- R+10.1
- Relative to other polls of the same races
- Even
- Typical size of miss
- 13.2 pts
Error is the poll's D−R margin minus the count's, as shares of all votes in the race; D+ means it showed Democrats doing better than they did. From fewer than 5 polls, so read it as a few data points, not a pattern.
§6Its polls
| In the field | Question | Result | With | Paid for by | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 22–October 28, 2026 | U.S. House · 2026 CA-01 | Mike McGuire 54 · James Gallagher 40 | University of Southern California Democracy and Fair Elections Lab | University of Southern California Center for the Political Future | 439 LV |
| October 22–October 28, 2026 | U.S. House · 2026 CA-06 | Richard Pan 55 · Kevin Kiley 43 | University of Southern California Democracy and Fair Elections Lab | University of Southern California Center for the Political Future | 439 LV |
| October 22–October 28, 2026 | U.S. House · 2026 CA-22 | Randy Villegas 54 · David Valadao 44 | University of Southern California Democracy and Fair Elections Lab | University of Southern California Center for the Political Future | 356 LV |
§7What we looked for and didn't find
- Our poll listings carry a joint byline of the USC Democracy and Fair Elections Lab and CESR for the October 2026 California House polls, but the Lab's release for those polls does not mention CESR, so CESR's role in them was not found.
- No standing news partner since the 2016 Los Angeles Times arrangement was found, and no outside fieldwork or panel vendor is named, since its election polls used its own Understanding America Study panel.
- Its election poll page describes a post-election review of the 2016 Daybreak poll that found too many rural respondents and reweighted the estimate; this was its own methodology review rather than a withdrawal of polls or a correction of a release, so it is not recorded as a finding.
- Searches found no AAPOR statement, court ruling or filing, regulator action, aggregator statement about excluding or reweighting its polls, or retraction by CESR.