Pollster · Commercial firm
Tulchin Research
- Polls since 2024
- 5
- Latest poll ended
- September 13, 2026
Polls from the VoteHub polling API, used under CC BY 4.0. Each result links to the pollster's or sponsor's own release. Imported once a day; a poll VoteHub later changes keeps its earlier version on record here.
§1About
Drafted by AI from the public sources cited. Each sentence links to its source.
Tulchin Research is a public opinion research firm with offices in San Francisco and Chicago that offers surveys, focus groups, ad testing and data analytics, according to its website.1,
§2Who it works with
Why this matters: Owners, news partners and the firms behind a poll's interviews shape what gets asked, how, and what gets published.
Polls regularly for
- Senate Majority PAC. Its clients page and Ben Tulchin's biography name Senate Majority PAC as a client.3,
4 - SEIU. Its clients page lists SEIU among the labor organizations it has worked with.4
- ACLU. Its website lists the ACLU among its clients and describes work on a criminal justice reform project.1,
4
Founded by
- Ben Tulchin (2009). Its biography of Ben Tulchin says he launched Tulchin Research in 2009.3
Led by
- Ben Tulchin. Its team page names Ben Tulchin as president.2
Who paid for its polls
| Sponsor | Polls | Between | Flagged party-aligned |
|---|---|---|---|
| House Majority PAC | 3 | June 21, 2026 – September 13, 2026 | Democratic-aligned sponsor (3) |
| Fighting for Michigan PAC | 1 | June 4, 2026 | Democratic-aligned sponsor (1) |
| Healthcare for Action | 1 | March 8, 2026 | Democratic-aligned sponsor (1) |
§3Whom it works for
Why this matters: A firm that also works for one party's campaigns can still publish accurate polls, but readers deserve to know.
Works for Democratic candidates or groups. Its clients page and its president's biography name Democratic party committees and caucuses, among them the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the California Assembly Democratic Caucus and the Illinois House Democratic Caucus, along with Senate Majority PAC and candidates such as Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newsom, and name no Republican campaign or committee. This rests on the clients it names.3,
- Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Its clients page and Ben Tulchin's biography name the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee as a client.3,
4 - California Assembly Democratic Caucus. Its clients page lists the California Assembly Democratic Caucus.4
- Bernie Sanders (2016–now). Its website says it was pollster for Bernie Sanders's 2016 presidential campaign, and Ben Tulchin's biography says he served as Sanders's pollster.1,
3 - Gavin Newsom. Its clients page and Ben Tulchin's biography name Gavin Newsom as a client.3,
4
Of its 5 polls listed since the 2024 election, VoteHub flags 5 as paid for by a Democratic-aligned sponsor and 0 by a Republican-aligned sponsor5.
Federal campaigns and committees that paid it
From 2023 through 2026, 23 federal committees reported paying Tulchin Research $1,461,855 for polling, surveys or research6,
| Committee | Kind | Party it reports | Paid for polling | Between |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CISNEROS FOR CONGRESS | House campaign | Democratic | $260,030 | September 19, 2023 – September 30, 2024 |
| FAIRSHAKE | Super PAC | None reported | $189,000 | July 1, 2025 – July 30, 2026 |
| DEREK TRAN FOR CONGRESS | House campaign | Democratic | $147,000 | November 15, 2023 – October 10, 2024 |
| FIGHTING FOR MICHIGAN PAC | Super PAC | None reported | $128,000 | February 25, 2026 – July 21, 2026 |
| NEW LEADERSHIP NOW | Super PAC | None reported | $115,015 | April 1, 2026 – May 11, 2026 |
| ESTHER KIM VARET FOR CONGRESS | House campaign | Democratic | $95,030 | November 18, 2025 – April 30, 2026 |
| DCCC | Party committee | Democratic | $62,500 | July 19, 2024 – December 20, 2024 |
| EVAN LOW FOR CONGRESS | House campaign | Democratic | $62,015 | July 26, 2024 – August 30, 2024 |
| NO SURRENDER FUND | PAC | None reported | $48,000 | November 18, 2025 – November 20, 2025 |
| FRIENDS OF JULIE | House campaign | Democratic | $44,000 | December 21, 2023 – January 10, 2024 |
| TORCHLIGHT PAC | PAC | Democratic | $39,000 | December 17, 2025 |
| DUNLAP FOR CONGRESS | House campaign | Democratic | $33,515 | March 2, 2026 – April 1, 2026 |
§4Record against results
Why this matters: The one test that doesn't depend on other polls: how close a firm's final polls came to what voters did.
From FiveThirtyEight's final public data10,
| Published as | Polls | Elections | Average miss | Relative to other polls | Typical size of miss | 538's last rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulchin Research | 3 | 2010–2018 | R+2.6 | D+3.8 | 2.6 pts | 0.9 of 3 · 1% partisan work |
ABC News closed FiveThirtyEight in March 2025; its data stops at the 2022 elections. 2026 results will be added once states certify them.
§5Its polls
| In the field | Question | Result | With | Paid for by | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 8–September 13, 2026 | U.S. House · 2026 FL-27 | Maria Elvira Salazar 47 · Eliott Rodriguez 46 | House Majority PACDemocratic-aligned sponsor | 600 LV | |
| July 9–July 13, 2026 | U.S. House · 2026 VA-02 | Elaine Luria 47 · Jen Kiggans 47 | House Majority PACDemocratic-aligned sponsor | 700 LV | |
| June 15–June 21, 2026 | U.S. House · 2026 CA-22 | Randy Villegas 48 · David Valadao 44 | House Majority PACDemocratic-aligned sponsor | 800 LV | |
| June 2–June 4, 2026 | U.S. Senate · 2026 Michigan | Abdul El-Sayed 46 · Mike Rogers 41 | Fighting for Michigan PACDemocratic-aligned sponsor | 500 LV | |
| March 4–March 8, 2026 | U.S. Senate · 2026 Illinois Democratic | Raja Krishnamoorthi 39 · Juliana Stratton 28 · Robin Kelly 12 · Kevin Ryan 3 · Christopher Swan 1 | Healthcare for ActionDemocratic-aligned sponsor | 600 LV |
§6What we looked for and didn't find
- No news partner or fieldwork vendor was named on the pages read.
- VoteHub lists Fighting for Michigan PAC, Healthcare for Action and House Majority PAC as sponsors of some of its polls; the Politico pages that carry those releases could not be fetched, and no standing arrangement with any of them was found.
- The clients page gives no dates for any client.
- One search for AAPOR statements, lawsuits, retractions and complaints found none naming the firm; aggregator pages were not searched one by one.