Pollster · Academic

George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government

Also published as George Mason University School of Policy and Government, George Mason University.

Research draft
Polls since 2024
17
Latest poll ended
October 26, 2026
House effect vs. other polls
D+3.8
Record vs. results, relative
D+1.3

Polls from the VoteHub polling API, used under CC BY 4.0. Each result links to the pollster's or sponsor's own release. Imported once a day; a poll VoteHub later changes keeps its earlier version on record here.

§1About

Drafted by AI from the public sources cited. Each sentence links to its source.

George Mason University's Schar School of Policy and Government co-sponsors and co-funds the Washington Post-Schar School poll with The Washington Post, according to the methodology of an October 2025 Virginia poll.2 According to The Fourth Estate, George Mason's student newspaper, the partnership was announced in November 2016 after Schar School dean Mark Rozell approached the Post, and Mason faculty help design the surveys.3

Kind
Academic2

§2Who it works with

Why this matters: Owners, news partners and the firms behind a poll's interviews shape what gets asked, how, and what gets published.

Part of

  • George Mason University. The poll methodology names the Schar School of Policy and Government as part of George Mason University.2

News partners

  • The Washington Post (2016–now). The October 2025 Virginia poll says it was jointly sponsored and funded by The Washington Post and the Schar School, and The Fourth Estate reported in 2017 that the partnership was announced in November 2016.2,3

Fieldwork or panel by

  • Braun Research. The October 2025 Virginia poll says Braun Research of Princeton, New Jersey handled sampling, fieldwork and data processing, reaching voters by live calls to cellphones and landlines and by text-to-web.2

Published with

Names its polls have been published under, alongside other pollsters or news outlets.

  • Washington Post/George Mason University: The Washington Post · 8 polls listed
  • The Washington Post/George Mason University School of Policy and Government: The Washington Post · 5 polls listed
  • The Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government: The Washington Post · 4 polls listed

§3Whom it works for

Why this matters: A firm that also works for one party's campaigns can still publish accurate polls, but readers deserve to know.

Doesn’t say whom it works for. The poll methodology read describes joint sponsorship by the Post and the Schar School and says nothing about work for candidates or parties.2

Of its 17 polls listed since the 2024 election, VoteHub flags 0 as paid for by a Democratic-aligned sponsor and 0 by a Republican-aligned sponsor4.

§4How its numbers compare with other polls

Why this matters: A firm whose polls run steadily to one side of everyone else's is worth reading alongside others.

Each of its polls since the 2024 election is compared with other pollsters' polls of the same question whose field period ended within 14 days, each other pollster counted once4. The figure is the average gap, with a 95% margin. This compares it with other polls, not with the truth: the others can be the ones that are off.

Party margin
D+3.8 (±2.1) across 6 polls of the generic ballot and 2026 races, in 6 contests.

D+ means its polls showed Democrats doing better than other polls did; R+, Republicans. A figure from fewer than 5 polls isn't shown.

§5Record against results

Why this matters: The one test that doesn't depend on other polls: how close a firm's final polls came to what voters did.

From FiveThirtyEight's final public data5,6: general-election polls between a Democrat and a Republican in the last three weeks before each election, compared with the certified result. FiveThirtyEight rated each name polls were published under separately. Across all 8,957 such polls, the average miss was D+0.7, so the relative figure takes out the misses every pollster shared that year.

Error is the poll's D−R margin minus the result's; D+ means it showed Democrats doing better than they did.
Published asPollsElectionsAverage missRelative to other pollsTypical size of miss538's last rating
The Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government82016–2021D+0.9D+1.32.2 pts2.7 of 3

ABC News closed FiveThirtyEight in March 2025; its data stops at the 2022 elections. 2026 results will be added once states certify them.

§62026 record against the count

Why this matters: How close this pollster's last 2026 polls came to how people voted, measured the way FiveThirtyEight measured earlier elections.

One poll of one race between a Democrat and a Republican, with field periods ending in the 21 days before November 3, 2026, compared with each race's count. Some of those races are still being counted, so these figures use the unofficial count and will change until states certify.

Average miss
R+9.0
Relative to other polls of the same races
Even
Typical size of miss
9.0 pts

Error is the poll's D−R margin minus the count's, as shares of all votes in the race; D+ means it showed Democrats doing better than they did. From fewer than 5 polls, so read it as a few data points, not a pattern.

§7Its polls

The 17 polls of its we list, newest first.
In the fieldQuestionResultWithPaid for bySample
October 22–October 26, 2026U.S. Senate · 2026 KansasAdam Hamilton 52 · Roger Marshall 43 · David Graham 4The Washington Post801 LV
October 22–October 26, 2026Governor · 2026 KansasCindy Holscher 51 · Ty Masterson 45The Washington Post801 LV
October 14–October 19, 2026U.S. House · 2026 TX-34Vicente Gonzalez 50 · Eric Flores 43 · Eddie Espinoza 2 · Chris Royal 1The Washington Post626 LV
September 30–October 5, 2026Governor · 2026 MaineHannah Pingree 49 · Bobby Charles 36 · Rick Bennett 11The Washington Post800 LV
September 30–October 5, 2026U.S. Senate · 2026 MaineTroy Jackson 50 · Susan Collins 45The Washington Post800 LV
September 23–September 28, 2026U.S. House · 2026 VA-01Shannon Taylor 50 · Rob Wittman 46The Washington Post609 LV
September 23–September 28, 2026U.S. House · 2026 VA-05John McGuire 51 · Tom Perriello 46The Washington Post600 LV
September 10–September 14, 2026U.S. Senate · 2026 MichiganAbdul El-Sayed 48 · Mike Rogers 45The Washington Post803 LV
September 10–September 14, 2026Governor · 2026 MichiganJocelyn Benson 53 · John James 41The Washington Post803 LV
October 16–October 20, 2025Governor · 2025 VirginiaAbigail Spanberger 54 · Winsome Earle-Sears 42The Washington Post— LV
October 16–October 20, 2025Attorney general · 2025 VirginiaJay Jones 44 · Jason Miyares 44The Washington Post927 RV
October 16–October 20, 2025Attorney general · 2025 VirginiaJay Jones 46 · Jason Miyares 46The Washington Post— LV
October 16–October 20, 2025Governor · 2025 VirginiaAbigail Spanberger 53 · Winsome Earle-Sears 40The Washington Post927 RV
September 25–September 29, 2025Governor · 2025 VirginiaAbigail Spanberger 53 · Winsome Earle-Sears 40The Washington Post1,002 RV
September 25–September 29, 2025Attorney general · 2025 VirginiaJay Jones 48 · Jason Miyares 42The Washington Post1,002 RV
September 25–September 29, 2025Attorney general · 2025 VirginiaJay Jones 51 · Jason Miyares 45The Washington Post1,002 LV
September 25–September 29, 2025Governor · 2025 VirginiaAbigail Spanberger 55 · Winsome Earle-Sears 43The Washington Post1,002 LV

§8What we looked for and didn't find

  • The Schar School site (schar.gmu.edu) and washingtonpost.com refused automated requests, and older gmu.edu announcement pages now redirect, so current leadership, the poll team and 2026 methodology statements were not read; facts rest on one 2025 poll document hosted by Decision Desk HQ and a 2017 student newspaper report.
  • No founding year for the Schar School was found.
  • The fieldwork vendor is recorded from one 2025 poll; vendors for other polls were not checked.
  • No non-news clients, co-pollsters, campaign or party clients were found.
  • Findings search: web searches combining the name with AAPOR, aggregator exclusion, court, regulator and retraction terms found nothing that fits the finding rules, and AAPOR's statements page names none of this batch's firms.
  • Court records were checked only through web searches; PACER and state court dockets were not searched.