Ballot measure · California · November 3, 2026

Proposition 3

Title as the state lists it: Provides Permanent Funding for Schools and Health Care by Extending Existing Tax on High Incomes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.1,2,3,4

Research draftCitizen initiativeConstitutional amendment
How it got there
Citizen initiative
Kind of measure
Constitutional amendment
To pass
A majority of the votes on it
Researched
October 27, 2026

Research draft. We gathered this from official sources on October 27, 2026: election offices, state laws and court records, each linked to its source. Separate reviewers checked a random sample of 48 facts from the ballot-measure research against the cited sources and found no errors. The rest hasn't been reviewed fact by fact yet, so check the linked source before relying on anything here.

§1What your vote means

Drafted by AI from the public sources cited. Each sentence links to its source.

A yes vote

A yes vote would amend the state constitution to make permanent the higher income tax rates on high earners first approved in 2012 (on income over about $371,000 for a single filer at 2025 levels), which are now set to expire in 2031, and would direct that revenue to K–12 schools and community colleges.3,4

A no vote

A no vote would leave the higher income tax rates on high earners first approved in 2012 set to expire in 2031, so the state would stop collecting the revenue from those higher rates after that.3,4

§2How it got on the ballot

Citizen initiative. Voters proposed it by signing a petition.1,2,3,4

Constitutional amendment. It would change the state constitution.1,2,3,4

It is on California's list of statewide measures for November 3, 2026.1,2,5 One of these official sources itself calls the list certified or final. What we couldn't confirm about the list is in the notes on California's measures.

§3What it needs to pass

Drafted by AI from the public sources cited. Each sentence links to its source.

A majority of the votes on it. An initiative passes if more voters vote yes than no on it.6,7 Where in the source: Initiative Guide ch. IV, p. 17 (PDF p. 22), citing Cal. Const. art. II, § 10(a)