Immigration
Work eligibility checks (E-Verify)
18 public statements from 2026 candidates · 1 related bill
§1The range of views
Why this matters: Requiring it would make it harder to hire people who aren't allowed to work here, and it adds paperwork for employers and can wrongly flag eligible workers.
Drafted by AI, then checked for neutral wording in a separate AI review. It describes the question and the main positions, not any candidate's view. Facts link to their sources.
Whether all employers must use E-Verify, the federal online system for checking that new hires can legally work in the US, which federal contractors must already use under many federal contracts.1
- Keep it optional for most employers
- Require it only for larger employers or certain industries
- Require all employers to use it
These options describe policies, not people. The order is not a ranking.
§2What candidates have said
Why this matters: Statements candidates made publicly, summarized in plain words with a link to where they said it. Candidates who haven't spoken publicly on this issue aren't listed.
Drafted by AI from the public sources cited. Each sentence links to its source.
Keep it optional for most employers (1)
- David Jolly FL GovernorHis campaign website opposes state laws that require employers to use E-Verify, saying they hurt Florida's workforce.2
Require all employers to use it (6)
- Ken Calvert CA-40
- Brian Burley CA-42A platform document on his campaign website proposes requiring every state to put in place and enforce E-Verify for all employers in the state.5
- Byron Donalds FL GovernorHis campaign website says he would require every Florida business to use E-Verify.6
- Julia Letlow LA SenateHer campaign website says she would require E-Verify nationwide.7
- Michael Mebruer LA-6His campaign website says he supports mandatory nationwide use of E-Verify and clear, meaningful penalties for employers who knowingly hire workers who are not authorized to work.8
- Justin Murphy NJ SenateHis campaign website says E-Verify should be implemented for America's workforce.9
Statements that don't match one option (11)
- Jeff Wadlin AR SenateHis campaign website says he supports reliable workplace verification and that managers of companies that employ immigrants without legal status should face fines and criminal penalties.10
- Ritesh Tandon CA-17His campaign website says he would strengthen employer verification and anti-fraud enforcement and impose strong penalties for illegal hiring.11
- Tim Bennett CO-7His campaign website calls for restoring orderly, legal pathways for entry, strengthening employment checks and holding accountable employers who exploit vulnerable workers.12
- Michael "Dr. Mike" Katz DE SenateHis campaign website says workplace verification systems should be mandatory.13
- Frank J. Russo FL GovernorHis campaign website says he would strengthen employment verification requirements for state agencies and state contractors.14
- Bill Foster IL-11His campaign website says the 2013 Senate bill whose framework he supports would have followed those visa adjustments with strong E-Verify enforcement so that only people here legally could be hired.15
- Larry Davis III LA-6His campaign website's Policies page lists mandatory employment verification among his border security goals.16
- Blake Miguez LA-6His campaign website says that in Congress he will mandate E-Verify.17
- Rick Brattin MO-5His campaign website says that in the Missouri legislature he sponsored legislation to penalize companies that hire workers off the books without verifying their immigration status.18
- Cyril Jefferson NC-6His campaign website says he would protect American wages with E-Verify, along with expanding legal visa pathways and streamlining hiring for trusted employers.19
- Rebecca Bextel WY GovernorHer campaign website says she would seek legislation requiring E-Verify for state agencies, state contractors and companies that receive state economic development aid.20
§3Related bills
Why this matters: Bills from 2023–2026 that bear on this issue, with how Congress handled them.
- Voted on; did not become law